Sunday 29 April 2012

Typical Examination Questions based on Element 2 The Health & safety Policy

As the title sugests this post contains example question from element 2 of the NGC1 Management of health & safety certificate,

The Health & safety Policy

  1. Outline the main components of a health and safety management system. (8)

  2. Explain the factors that should be considered when drawing up the arrangements section of a safety policy. (8)

  3. Outline the factors that should be considered when auditing the effectiveness of compliance with an organisation's health and safety policy. (8)

  4. (a) Outline the legal requirements whereby employers must prepare a written statement of their health and safety policy. (2)

  5. (b) Explain the purposes of EACH of the following sections of a health and safety policy document:
    (i) 'statement of intent' (2)
    (ii) 'organisation' (2)
    (iii) 'arrangements' (2)
    (c) Outline the issues that are typically included in the arrangements section of a health and safety policy document. (12).

  6. (a) Identify the typical content of the 'statement of intent' section of an organisation's health and safety document. (2)
    (b) Outline the factors that may indicate that health and safety standards within an organization do not reflect the objectives within the 'statement of intent'. (6)

Element 2 The Health & safety Policy Typical Exam Questions Answers

E2/1 Answers should have included the objectives set out in HSG65.These are:

The safety policy as being a clear statement of intent, setting the main health and safety aims and objectives of the company

The organisation for health and safety to be such as to ensure clear allocation of responsibilities to members of staff with the emphasis on achieving competency, control, communications and consultation.

Planning and implementation to involve risk assessment, the setting of standards and the introduction of appropriate control measures to achieve standards

Measuring performance by proactive and reactive monitoring methods

Review and auditing to check whether what was planned is actually happening and to consider options for improvement, setting new targets where necessary

E2/2 The answer should include factors rather than a list of topics.
For example, type of Organisation, work processes, hazards, format, layout, skill factors and type of workforce. Marks would be awarded for considering content although this is not the main thrust of this question.

E2/3 Factors that could be included are; the quality, availability and understanding by the workforce of the policy; The use of site tours and inspections etc.; the relevance of performance indicators (e.g. accidents/incident rates); the standard and use of training and maintenance along with records; the cross-checking of health and safety arrangements against practical implementation, the standard of conformance with both management and shop floor activities.

E2/4
(a) The requirements for a safety policy is imposed on employers with 5 or more employees by the Health and safety at Work Act 1974

(b) Statement of intent - demonstrates the organisation's commitment to, and sets objectives for, health and safety

Organisation - identifies health and safety responsibilities and communication channels within the organisation

Arrangements section - details the practical means of achieving the objectives laid down in the policy statement

(c) This section should identify a range of health and safety issues for which arrangements should be in place. For example: Machinery, hazardous substances, manual handling, fire, accident investigation, reporting and control, employee consultation, monitoring arrangements, emergency procedures, risk assessments, maintenance, selection and training of staff etc.

E2/5
  1. (a) The 'statement of intent' is designed to provide an overview of the general health and safety goals and objectives of an organization. Additionally, it should be signd by the most senior person in the organization to demonstrate management's commitment to achieving the stated objectives.

  2. (b) Answers should include:

    • Failure to communicate the policy to employees
    • A lack of commitment from management
    • A lack of investment in health and safety
    • A poor overall safety culture
    • High accident, incident and ill-health rates
    • Low moralamongst employees
    • High staff turnover
    • Unacceptable rates of absenteeism
    • Unsafe and poorly maintained equipment
    • Inadequate provision of personalprotective equipment
    • The absence of monitoring procedures.

Monday 23 April 2012

The Health & Safety Policy

This post is inteneded to help explain the purpose and importance of setting policy for health and safety and describe the key features and appropriate content of an effective health and safety policy.

  1. The importance of setting policy for health and safety

  2. The most effective means of demonstrating the importance of health and safety issues is for organisations to have a health and safety policy that is signed and dated by the most senior member of the management team. The need for all employers to create in writing a safety policy is a statutory requirement under section 2(3) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. Small organisations with less than 5 employees still require a health and safety policy, but not in writing.
    This is only the law emphasising what has been known for many years - good organisations have safety policies at the heart of their safety manag.ement arrangements.
    Policies should be 'enabling' like the Health and Safety at Work etc Act itself that is, written in a way that is reasonable and logical and the touchstone against what every activity within the organisation can be benchmarked.
    The policy in itself can assign responsibilities and set methods by which the organisation's policy on health and safety issues can be implemented.
    These assigned responsibilities and accountabilities must not be in any conflict with any person's job descriptions and should be taken into account when considering if what employees are being asked to do is reasonable within time constraints.
    Accountability is the primary key and this is not the same as responsibility. Accountability is responsibility that is evaluated and measured during safety audits and, during annual individual job appraisals.
    The policy should include a simple statement of the intent of management, together with the details of the organisation along with delegated responsibilities at each level of the operation.
    This policy must be made known to every employee and 'made known' does not mean just displaying it on the company notice board. A useful method to ensure that the policy is 'made known' to every employee is to arrange for them to read it and sign a document to that effect.
  3. The key features and appropriate content of an organisation's health and safety policy

  4. We must not get mixed up in our minds between a safety policy and a safety manual. These are not the same even though in some organisations they are combined.
    The safety policy should set targets and make reference to the safety manual as well as other stand-alone documentation like maintenance manuals or training programmes.
    The policy should provide all employees with concise details of the health and safety objectives of the organisation.
    That is what everyone must know and take account of.
    Employees must also be aware of their responsibilities as related to their particular job within the organisation and how their actions or inaction impact upon other people..
    In large organisations with several sites, possibly doing entirely different types of operations, the safety policy of intent will be the same but detailed arrangements for implementing it will be written at local level.
    Organisational arrangements
    Whether the company is a multi-national corporation or a small business, the policy must contain the same basic matters.
    Obviously, the requirements for large corporati6ns will be much more extensive than for amall business where in many cases the management system can be to a great extent informal.
    A health and safety policy will normally have three sections:-
    The statement of intention - this will set out an expression of intention, and commitment, to matters concerning health and safety.
    The organisation section will describe the responsibility of line managers and employees at all levels.
    The arrangements section will detail the way in which health and safety is managed. The arrangement section may include:-
    • The systems by which safety performance is monitored in order to identify, record and take appropriate action to deal with deficiencies in performance
    • Identification of the main hazards likely to be encountered by the workforce or other persons who may be affected by work activities.
    • Significant findings of generic risk assessments and any circumstances when specific risk assessments will be required with arrangements or cross references for dealing with them
    • Employee selection criteria and subsequent training arrangements
    • Buildings, plant, machinery, equipment selection criteria along with maintenance arrangements and statutory examination and testing
    • Material and substance purchasing policy and arrangements
    • Safety arrangements for products and services
    • Occupational health facilities including first-aid arrangements
    • Environmental monitoring policy and arrangements
    • Methods of reporting accidents and incidents
    • Methods used to investigate accidents and incidents
    • Arrangements to validate, appoint and control the work of contractors
    • The policy for the assessment of the need for personal protective equipment, it's purchase, availability, use, storage and replacement arrangements along with training requirements
    • Workers consultation arrangements, for example, safety committees
    • Fire and other emergency arrangements
    • Arrangements for dealing with safety violations and of encouraging conformance

Other considerations

Safety policies as written statements of the intention of management should be live working documents. They serve as a record of the standard of care that management is intending to provide.
They offer a useful method of evaluating an organisation in terms of their commitment to health and safety matters.
Unfortunately in a considerable number of organisations, especially smaller ones, the policy is merely a useful document to produce if asked to do so by inspectors, insurance companies or clients. In these cases any similarity between what the policy says and what is happening may be only co-incidental!
In using the policy to validate clients it is important to look closely at samples of activities to assess if the policy is indeed a live enabling one or merely cosmetic.
Because the policy is a statutory requirement it may well be used as evidence during a possible prosecution or civil claim for damages.

Revision of safety policy

Safety policies should be revised as often as is necessary. If the statement of intent is well worded in enabling terms it should, like The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, stand up well to the test of time.
It is more likely that changes will be required occasionally for one or more of the following reasons:
  • New or amended legislation
  • The setting of new case law precedents
  • Following an incident that demonstrated a need for change
Changes in:
  • products or services
  • work processes or machinery
  • personnel
  • hours of work
  • premises

The function of the safety policy

Safety policy statements and associate documentation serve as a structure to demonstrate that the organisation is meeting its common and statutory legal requirements. It should always be remembered that the law demands only the minimum of what is acceptable.
Good organisations should use the policy as a stepping-stone to higher objectives that can be based on moral duties and the reduction of financial loss.

Monday 9 April 2012

Typical Examination Question (with answers) From the Management of Health & Safety Paper NGC1

1.

(a) Define the term 'Negligence' (2)
(b) Outline the THREE standard conditions that must be met for an employee to prove a case of alleged negligence against an employer. (6)

Answers

(a) Negligence is a civil wrong (delict/tort) involving unreasonable, careless conduct or a breach of common law duty of care resulting in loss, damage or injury.
(b)
  1. A duty of care was owed by the employer
  2. There was a breach of that duty
  3. The breach led directly to the loss, injury or damage.

2. Explain with examples the meaning of the follow terms:
(i) 'Hazard' (2)
(ii) Risk (3)
(iii) 'So far as is reasonably practicable' (3)

Answers

(i) Hazard - Something with the inherent ability to cause harm
(ii) Risk- The degree•of exposure to the harm x the potential harm factor

(iii) So far as is reasonably practicable - Assessing risk i.e. the potential harm against sacrifice i.e. the cost in terms of money loss of production or other costs

3. Outline with an example of each the difference between a HSC approved codes of practice and a HSE guidance note. (8)

Answers

An ACOP is a practice approved by the HSC with the consent of the Secretary of State and is a recognised interpretation of how an employer may comply with their associated legislation. Although failure to comply is not in itself an offence, the failure may be cited in court in criminal proceedings.
Employers would need to show the met the requirements of the ACOP or show they complied with an equal or better standard. An example is the ACOP to the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999
Guidance is is ued by the HSE with the intentions of giving advice on good practice Guidance is normally more practically based than ACOP's and has no legal standing in a court of law.
Examples include those issued on manual handling or Display screen equipment

4. Outline the difference between civil law and criminal law. (8)

Answers

Among the differences are Civil law provides remedies while criminal law punishes. The burdens of proof are different in civil law 'On a balance of probability', .in criminal law 'beyond all reasonable doubt'. In civil law the parties involved are two civil bodies (individuals or corporate bodies) whereas in criminal cases it is the state and an individual or corporate body.
There are differences in the sources of law with criminal law generally written in statutes and civil law by judicial precedent

5. (a) Explain giving an example in each case the circumstance under which a health and safety inspector may serve;
(i) An improvement notice• (3)
(ii) A prohibition notice (3)
(b) State the effect on each type of enforcement notice of appealing against it. (2)

Answers

Improvement notices are issued when an inspector believes a statutory duty is being, or likely to be breach. For example carrying out work which may have significant risks associated with it and which no risk assessment has been made.
Prohibition notices are issued when the inspector considers there is imminent danger. For example, working with a crane in close proximity to high voltage power lines with no specific safety arrangements.
An appeal against an improvement notice would mean the notice is set aside until the appeal is heard. In the case of an appeal against a prohibition notice the notice will stand until the appeal is heard.

6. Outline the powers given to health and safety inspectors under The Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (8)

Answers

Powers given to inspectors include:
  • Gain access, without a warrant, to a workplace at any reasonable time.
  • Employ police to assist them, where necessary.
  • Take equipment, etc on to premises to assist in investigations.
  • Carry out examinations and investigations as deemed necessary.
  • Direct that locations remain undisturbed for as long as he/she deems necessary.
  • Take measurements, photographs and samples.
  • Take statements; remove certain records and documents.
  • Require facilities to assist with enquiries.
  • Issue improvement or prohibition notices
  • Instigate criminal proceeding against individuals or corporate bodies for breaches of criminal law
  • Do anything else necessary to enable his/her duty to be carried out.

Sunday 8 April 2012

MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH AND SAFETY

Foundations in health and safety

From this post is is hoped that readers whos are studying for a NEBOSH certificate will gain an understanding of what will be required for the NCG1 paper, this post is intended to help
1.1 Outline the scope and nature of occupational health and safety
1.2 Explain briefly the moral, legal and financial reasons for promoting good standards of health and safety.
1.3 Outline the legal framework for the regulation of health and safety
1.4 Describe the roles and powers of enforcement agencies, the judiciary and externalagencies
1.5 Identify the nature and key sources of health and safety information
1.6 Outline the key elements of a health ansafety management system.

Content

1.1 The scope and nature of occupational health and safety

Health, safety, welfare and environmental protection

  • Health is concerned with the soundness of our physical body and our mind. That is, a condition of our mind and body.
  • Safety is defined as 'free from harm, injury and risk'. That is, a condition we are in, where the wellbeing of our body and mind are not in danger of being adversely affected.
  • Welfare is a collection of things that are put in place to ensure our wellbeing (our health) is looked after.
  • Environmental protection is the guardianship we use to protect the environment, that is, the air, water and earth that surrounds us.
From these statements it can be seen that each of the above is different yet at the same time interrelated in that they are all concernd with the basic function of protecting life and the wellbeing of people.
Accidents, dangerous occurrences, near misses, and work-related ill health (physiological and psychological)
  • Accidents can be defined as undesired, unplanned events in a series of planned events. The adverse consequences are, in the majority of cases immediate, but can be longer term. These consequences can have both physiological and psychological effects.
  • Dangerous occurrences are events that have the ability to cause injury and damage. The consequences can be anything from minor to disastrous.
  • Near misses, are dangerous occurrences that, in the incident in question, did not lead to an accident or dangerous occurrence.
  • Work related ill-health happens when our protective shields of welfare and environmental protection fail to protect us. Ill-heath, like an accident, can have immediate consequences, but more likely will have long-term consequences often referred to as slow injuries.

Hazard and risk

  • Hazard is something that has the inherent ability to cause harm. It can be animal, vegetable, mineral or abstract. It is quantitative; for example, slightly hazardous or very hazardous. Examples: a human, a poisonous plant, asbestos, or threatening behaviour.
  • Risk is the possibility of exposure to a hazard. Often measured as: Severity of hazard x probability of exposure

1.2 The moral, legal and financial reasons for maintaining and promoting health and safety

Civil law and criminallaw (purpose, burdens of proof and remedies)

Civil law is the law that remains in areas where the state, through Acts of parliament, has not penetrated or intervened. It is law based upon the determination of particular cases in which judgements are made in courts, or on the formulation of general principles.
The purpose of civil law is to compensate a person or organisation (the pursuer) who brings an action for damages against another (the defendant) who has been found guilty of negligence. The person who has suffered the injury or damage must start the action.
The burden of proof is based on 'a preponderance (balance) of probability' and the remedy is reparation or financial compensation.
Criminal law is concerned essentially, with those offences that the state seeks to prevent. These offences can be against the state, against persons or against property.
The burden of proof is 'beyond all reasonable doubt' and it is for the prosecutor to prove this.
A person or organisation found guilty under criminal law of an offence can have penalties imposed. These penalties can befines or imprisonment.

Common (Civil) Law

The evolvement of acceptable customs

We,that is, The people living today, are a product of an evolved civilisation going back through history to a time when groups of people lived in isolation. As communal groups increased, it was necessary that members of the communities developed culturally acceptable standards of behaviour compatible with living together. This is true of all animals e.g. rats, elephants, tigers, humans, monkeys or apes etc.

Eventually the various types and forms of living creatures, of which man is one, developed customs, practices and procedures which allowed the groups to live in comparative peace and harmony, both within the groups and indeed in co-habitation with other groups.
As groups enlarged and developed, leaders or councils were elected and they in turn appointed people to make judgements about disputes within the group. This has evolved until today where we have sheriffs and judges who make decisions through our civil courts settling disputes between various individuals and/or factions.

When decisions are not well received within a society, wise leaders pay attention to this, so that if a similar type incident arises, decisions will be based on how their previous decisions were accepted.

Today we call such action 'Court Precedents'.

There are many former court cases, which have set precedents and are used by sheriffs and judges when making decisions on cases. It should be noted that, when a superior court makes a judgement, all inferior courts must take the decision into account in making their judgements.

From this method of precedents and evolving law based on cultural acceptable standards, we developed what is known as 'Common Law'.

At work under common law there are five main duties of care that employers owe to their employees. These are to give them:

(i) A safe place of work

In complying with this duty, we must consider the complete 'goldfish bowl' in which people work. That is, the condition of the following:
  • Grounds, buildings and layout.
  • Machinery.
  • Safe storage, handling and use of articles and substances.
  • Utility services (electricity, gas, water, pneumatics, hydraulics etc).
  • Environment (temperature/dust/fumes/humidity/lighting/noise/quality of air etc).
(ii) Safe access and egress to/from the workplace

Consider: vehicles, passageways, stairs, ladders, scaffolds, special needs of people, emergency arrangements etc.

(iii) Adequate (fit for purpose) plant, machinery and tools

Consider: fitness for purpose, maintenance, controls, ergonomics (both physical and psychological) etc.

(iv) Safe systems of work

Consider: associated hazards, risks, dangers, compatibility with human abilities and limitations etc.

(v) Competent work-mates

Understand that work-mates are not only members of peer groups of workers but also include:
  • Supervisors, managers and directors whose acts or omissions ca_n affect others
  • Contractors who become work-mates.
All of these duties evolve in line with what is acceptable within society. Therefore what was acceptable yesterday may not be acceptable today, and what is acceptable today may not be acceptable tomorrow.

Back to Top.

One of the basic problems with common law is that before a person can proceed ith a civil action for injury or damage the injury or damage has to be_ sustained.Hence the reason the state brings in statutory laws.

The size of the health and safety problem can be seen in the following chart:


Key annual figures 2010/11
Ill Health 1.2 million working people were suffering from a work-related illness.
Occupational Cancer Over 5000 casesestimated each yearfrom the constructionindustryOther
Occupational Asthma About 30 000 people currently report they are suffering from breathing or lung problems caused or made worse by their work
2321 people died from mesothelioma in 2009 and thousands more from other occupational cancers and diseases such as COPD.
Injuries 171 workers killed at work.
115 000 injuries were reported under RIDDOR.
200 000 reportable injuries (over 3 day absence) occurredoccurred, according to the Labour Force Survey, a rate of 710 per 100 000 workers..
Working Days Lost 26.4 million working days were lost due to work-related illness and workplace injury 15 days per case of work-related illness or workplace injury.
Enforcement 551 offences were prosecuted by HSE with a conviction rate of 94%
129 offences were prosecuted by local authorities with a conviction rate of 97%

Source: HSC Health and Safety Statistics 2010/11.

It speaks for itself when reflecting on these figures that there is a strong moral argument in a civilised society to do all that we can to stop people's quality of life, if not life itself, being destroyed by work activities.

Cost of accidents

Justification of costs of implementing safety and health measures can be seen in terms of:
  • Keeping the company on the right side of the law
  • Reducing insurance claims
  • Good public and industrial relations
  • Looking after the good reputation of the organisation
  • Improving morale within the workforce
In addition to the above, accidents are more costly to a company than is generally appreciated. The cost of accidents is divided into direct costs (that is insurance costs) and indirect costs. Associated with every accident unplanned and/or unmanaged event) are considerable losses that are absorbed into what is called overhead costs. These costs are in addition to what would normally be recovered from insurance plus the cost of first-aid facilities.

Indirect costs can include:
  • Lost time and talent of the injured employee
  • Lost production and with it, the possible goodwill of customers )
  • Cost of investigation with possible highlighting of other deficiencies
  • Court expenditure, including possible fines etc.,
  • Damage to property, plant and machinery
  • Cost of industrial and/or public unrest
  • Increased insurance premiums
Accident costs

These average indirect costs are based on random sampling.
  • Three day reportable type incidents resulted in losses of................... £589.00
  • First aid treatment incidents (including up to two days absence) ........ £18.00
  • Damage type incidents .....................................................................£274.00
The average number of reportable injury incidents in a factory employing 1,000 people is 30 per year.
A review of first aid incidents indicates that the number of entries in first aid books tends to be around
75% of the numbers employed. Note: This does not means that 75% of the workforce requires treatment. Some employees attend for treatment more often than others.
All statistical evidence suggests that there are many more damage type incidents at work than injury incidents.
The survey did not take account of either downtime incidents or cumulative injuries, unless they were recorded in accident books. Note: Statistics have shown that on average, there are a great many more cumulative health injuries at work than physical reportable type injuries.

Back to Top.

Indirect costs

Using these figures we arrive at:
30 x three day incidents at £589.00 each ..........= £17,670.00
750 incidents at £18.00 each ............................= £13,500.00

Assuming that the number of damage incidents are the same as injury ones:
780 damage incidents = £213,720.00

This gives a totalcost of
Turnover costs: = £244,890.00

The only place the money to pay for accidents can come from is turnover profit.
If an organisation's turnover profit is 10%, then for every pound lost in accidents, they must turnover ten pounds.


From the figures above, the organisation would have to turnover £2,448,900

In terms of production this would be the equivalent of:
Making and selling 244,890 shirts with a wholesale price of £10.00.

Purchasing land, obtaining building permission, designing houses and then building an estate of 30 semi-detached houses and selling them.

Optimum level loss control

It is not possible to save all such losses. However if an organisation commits itself to diligently applying a total loss prevention programme, substantial savings can be made on losses that are normally just absorbed into 'overhead costs'.

1.3 The legal framework for the regulation of health and safety

Statute (criminal) law

Today much of our statute law is being brought in under the umbrella of the Regulations and Directives from the European Union. EU Regulations are directly imposed upon member states, whereas Directives set out general principals that each member state must encompass into their statute laws within an agreed time-scale.

Statute laws, when introduced by the state, will mean that those not complying with the law can be prosecuted by the state through the criminal courts, where if found guilty, the perpetrator of the
offence can be given a warning, fined or sent to prison.

Statutory law

Statute laws are Acts of Parliament such as The Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, together with the Regulations, Rules and Orders made within the scope of the Acts.

Modern Acts of Parliament set out principles or objectives and use specific Regulations or Orders to implement the principles/objectives.

Acts of Parliament are primary or principal legislation, whereas Regulations made under the Acts are secondary delegated legislation.By-laws made by local authorities are another example of delegated legislation. Ministers of the Crown make regulations via powers given to them by a Principal Act. Once introduced, they become statute law like the Acts of Parliament and breaches of them
constitute a criminal offence.

Most current legislation concerning health, safety and welfare and almost all of what will be future legislation originates within the European Community framework.

Back to Top.

Administration

The administration of the E.U. is carried out through four bodies:
  • The Commission
This is formed of Commissioners representing each of the member states. The Commission administers the law throughout the E.U. similar to that of the U.K. civil service. E.U.. Iegislation originates from the Commission in the form of Directives sent for approval to the Council of Ministers.
  • The Council of Ministers
This is composed of delegates from each member state. It is similar to the Government of the U.K. and voting is proportional, depending on the size of each country's population. Matters concerning health and safety are subject to qualified majority voting.
  • The European Parliament
This is formed of representatives elected from constituencies from within member states. It consults and debates on all proposed legislation.
  • European Court of Justice
This adjudicates on the law of .the EEC and its decision is binding upon all member states' judicial courts by virtue of the EEC Act 1972. It has 13 Judges, including one from each member state. The European Court of Human Rights enforces agreed community standards on the protection of human rights and fundamental freedom.

Elements of EC law

Apart from the general provisions of the Treaty of Rome (which is signed by all member states), there are three elements of European Law:
  • European Regulations

These are passed by the Council of Ministers and are adopted immediately .into the legal framework of each member state. They a.re directly imposed on every citizen living within the EC.
  • Directives

These set out general objective standards, which must be achieved by member states within a specific time-scale. Member states can decide whether to alter their own individual legal framework to meet the objectives of Directives or adopt them directly. In the UK, the implementation is by Statutory Instruments, i.e. Regulations.
  • Decisions

These are decisions reached when a matter is taken to the European Courts and affects only the parties directly concerned, although they do set precedents.
Back to Top.

Statutory Jaw

Statute laws are Acts of Parliament such as The Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, together with the Regulations, Rules and Orders made within the scope of the Acts.
Modern Acts of Parliament set out principles or objectives and use specific Regulations or Orders to implement the principles/objectives.
Acts of Parliament are primary or principal legislation, whereas Regulations made under the Acts are secondary delegated legislation. By-laws made by local authorities are another example of delegated legislation. Ministers of the Crown make regulations via powers given to them by a Principal Act. Once introduced, they become statute law like the Acts of Parliament and breaches of them constitute a criminal offence.

The Health and Safety at Work etc, Act, 1974

This is the primary piece of legislation on which all of our statutory legal requirements concerning health and safety at work is based. It is an enabling Act in that it sets out objectives to be achieved rather than specific requirements.

The following sections, 2 - 9 contain the main thrust of those requirements.

Section 2

Employers must take all reasonable care to safeguard the health, safety and welfare of their employees. In particular this means providing and maintaining:
  • Safe plant and systems of work.
  • Safe handling, storage, maintenance and transportation of articles and substances associated with work.
  • Adequate selection of employees and thereafter providing sufficient information, instruction, training and supervision.
  • Safe places of work including access and egress.
  • Safe working environments and adequate welfare facilities
There is an absolute duty on employers with five or more employees to prepare revise as necessary and communicate to all staff, a written safety policy detailing a policy of intent and organisational arrangements for implementing it.
Employers must consult with employees on health and safety matters, and where requested to do so by two or more trades union appointed safety representative, set up a safety committee.
The self -employed has similar duties but do not require a written safety policy.

Sections 3 and 4

These sections impose duties of care on employers towards persons other than employees, e.g. contractors, visitors, self-employed and general public.

Section 5

Repealed

Section 6

Designers, manufacturers, importers, installers and those who hire out plant and/or equipment have a duty to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the article or substance for use at work is safe when being properly used.
Sufficient tests etc., must be competently carried out to validate the article or substance for use at work.
All necessary information must be provided regarding the article or substance and the safeguards to be observed when using or storing it. Such information should not just be 'made available'.

Section 7 and 8

Duties are placed on employees at work to:
  • Take all reasonable care for their own health and safety and the health and safety of anyone who may be affected by their acts or omissions.
  • Co-operate with their employers to meet legal obligations.
  • Neither intentionally, nor recklessly interfere with or misuse anything whether plant, equipment or methods of work, provided by their employer to meet obligations under this or any related legislation.

Section 9

The employer is not allo ed to charge employees for anything done or provided to meet specific statutory requirements.

Approved codes of practice

These are brought in to supplement statutory legislation such as Acts and Regulations.
They give guidance on the general requirements and explain how the requirements can best be adequately implemented. This effectively allows standards to be kept current by altering the ACOP rather than having to amend the legislation.
Failure to comply with an ACOP is not in itself an offence, but failure is held to be proof of contravention unless the defender can show the compliance was achieved in some other way.
The test would be that the 'other way' did not in any way circumvent the element of care in the ACOP.

Back to Top.

Guidance notes

These are issued by the HSE as opinions of good practice. They have no legal force, but becquse of their origin would be 'persuasive' in practice with lower courts, and useful in civil cases to establish reasonable standards of care.
Types of duties imposed by statute
  • Absolute duty - otherwise known as 'Strict Liability'
An Act or Regulation where there is a high risk of severe injury or a high risk of an occurrence,
which could lead to severe injury, imposes this duty. The words 'must' or 'shall' appear in the , )
requirement of the Act or Regulation.
  • Duty to do what is 'Practicable'
• Some Regulations state that action must be taken so far as is practicable. To implement this duty, the employer must consider current technological knowledge and feasibility. Some degree of reasonability can be applied and account taken of current practice - but cautiously. 'Practicable' means something less than physically possible.
  • Duty to do 'So far as is reasonably practicable'
This phrase qualifies almost all of the general duties imposed by the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
It allows a balance to be made between the cost of the action proposed (in terms of money,
time or inconvenience) against the degree of risk associated with the situation being )
considered.

The employer's duty of care and the rights and expectations of employees

The employer's duty of care toward employees is expressed in common law as providing:
  • A safe place of work
  • Safe access and egress to and from the place of work
  • Adequate and safe plant machinery and tools for use at work
  • Safe systems of work
  • Competent work-mates
In addition employers have a duty to ensure their work activities do not impinge upon the wellbeing of other persons.
These duties are now embedded within statutory law in the form of The Health and Safety at Work etc., Act 1974 and Regulations made thereunder. Employees have the right to expect their employer to give all due care and attention to matters concerning their health and saf ty. That is the employer meeting both his statutory and common law duties of care.

The employer's common law and statutory duties of care

The duties of care include such items as ensuring:
  • Adequate consideration is given to the selection of staff that are, or can be, developed through education and training to be able to competently carry out the type of work detailed in their job
    description.
  • Proper consideration is given to the adequacy and maintenance of places of work, plant,
    machinery, tools and systems of work. These must be maintained in conditions that are safe and free from undue risks to employees or any other persons who may be affected by work activities.
  • Sufficient monitoring arrangements are carried out that will identify non-conformances of or to the management systems and thereafter taking appropriate action to eliminate such non­ conformances.
Back to Top.

1.4 The role and powers of enforcing agencies,the judiciary and external agencies

Criminal liabilities

The enforcement arrangements
  • The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is the enforcement body of the Health and Safety Commission (HSC).
The HSC consists of ten .members appointed by the Government from industry, trade unions, local authorities and other interested groups (currently consumers).
The HSE has the principle responsibility for enforcing legislation and employ enforcement officers (inspectors). For lower risk activities and premises such as offices and retail outlets, the powers of enforcement are delegated to local authority environmental departments, whose officers (EHOs) have the same powers as HSE inspectors.

Powers of inspectors

An appointed inspector can:
  • Gain access, without a warrant, to a workplace at any reasonable time.
  • Employ police to assist them, where necessary.
  • Take equipment, etc on to premises to assist in investigations.
  • Carry out examinations and investigations as deemed necessary.
  • Direct that locations remain undisturbed for as long as they deem necessary.
  • Take measurements, photographs and samples.
  • Take statements; remove certain records and documents.
  • Require facilities to assist with enquiries.
  • Do anything else necessary to enable their duties to be carried out.
Enforcement

Where an inspector discovers what is considered to be a contravention of an Act or Regulation, they
can:
  • Issue a Prohibition Notice with immediate or deferred effect. Such a notice will prohibit the activity described in it. The inspector will issue such a notice where it is considered that there is an imminent risk of serious injury.
    • An appeal can be made against the notice but the notice will remain in force until the appeal is heard.
  • Issue an Improvement Notice, which will specify a timescale within which the rectification of the contravention must take place.
    • Appeals can be made within 21 days to an employment tribunal.This would postpone the notice until the appeal is heard.
  • Prosecute any individualwho contravenes a requirement or fails to comply with a notice.
  • Seize and/or render harmless any substance or article which is considered to be of imminent danger.
Penalties

The Health and Safety at Work etc Act, section 33 (as amended) sets out the offences and maximum penalties under health and safety legislation.

Failing to comply with an improvement or prohibition notice, or a court remedy order (issued under the HSW Act sections 21, 22 and 42 respectively):
Lower court maximum £20,000 and/or 6 months imprisonment

Higher court maximum unlimited fine and/or 2 years imprisonment
Breach of sections 2 - 6 of the HSW Act, which set out the general duties of employers, self­ employed persons, manufacturers and suppliers to safeguard the health and safety of workers and members of the public who may be affected by work activities:
Lower court maximum £20,000

Higher court maximum unlimited fine
Other breaches of the HSW Act, and breaches of 1relevant statutory provisions' under the Act, which include all health and safety regulations. These impose both general and more specific requirements, such as requirements to carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment or to
provide suitable personal protective equipment:
Lower court maximum £5,000

Higher court maximum unlimited fine
Contravening licence requirements, or provisions relating to explosives. Licensing requirements apply to nuclear installations, asbestos removal, and storage and manufacture of explosives. All entail serious hazards, which must be rigorously controlled.
Lower court maximum £5,000

Higher court maximum unlimited fine and/or 2 years imprisonment

Back to Top.

Employment tribunals

Tribunals are part of the statutory system of law in which different tribunals are regulated by differing statutory provisions. They are not courts but are bodies established to make decisions in particular areas of law. The legal instrument that brings them into being regulates them. Employment Tribunals are chaired by a legally qualified person and normally have one member representing the CBI and one representing the TUC. The tribunal has the power to either cancel or affirm a notice. The tribunal can affirm the notice in its original form or with such modifications as the tribunal may in the circumstances see fit.

Appeals against tribunal decisions are allowed on questions of law, decisions being referred back to the tribunal if it has acted improperly, exceeded it's jurisdiction or refused to hear a case.

Civil liabilities

A 'delict' is a civil wrong; it is termed a 'tort' in England. It is harmful conduct by a person or organisation that causes loss or injury to another person. It subjects the person or organisation responsible for a loss or injury to legal liability and to make reparation for the damage caused.
Delict is summed up by the maxim 'Damnum injuria datum'- loss caused by legal wrong. The three elements can be defined as:
  • Damnum - loss or injury suffered by the party who has been wronged.
  • Injuria - conduct which mounts to a legal wrong.
  • A causative link between damnum and injuria Le.loss and injury must be directly linked to the legal wrong.
The duty of care required by common law, if civil liability for negligence is to be avoided, seeks to ensure simply that a person takes 'reasonable care' if he is in a situation where, if he were to fail to take such care, it could be foreseen that somebody else might suffer injury or loss.
Negligence is when a person fails in their common law duty of care to another.
The three questions, which must be answered in the affirmative in order to establish liability for negligence, are:
(i) Did the defender owe a duty of care to the pursuer?
(ii) Was there a breach of that duty of care?
(iii) Did the damages sustained by the pursuer result directly from the breach of duty?
Vicarious liability

Vicarious liability is where one person is held responsible for the acts or omissions of another.
Under common law, an employer is always held responsible for the acts or omissions of his employees whilst they are at work.

Courts

Civil cases in Scotland are dealt with at the Sheriff Court and appeals firstly at the Court of Session
and thereafter in the House of Lords.
Criminal cases in Scotland would normally be heard in the Sheriff Court and appeals in the High
Court of Justiciary and thereafter the Criminal Court of Appeal.

Defences

General defences that may be pleaded are:
  • All reasonable action was taken.
  • No duty of care was owed.
  • There was no breach of duty.
  • The injury/damage was too remote from the breach.
  • Mistake.
  • Statutory requirement i.e. the act was carried out under a statutory requirement.
  • Necessity e.g. where a house on fire is demolished.
  • Private defence e.g. reasonable force is used to defend oneself.
  • Inevitable accident e.g. not avoidable by any reasonable action that may have been taken.
  • Volenti-non-fit injuria i.e. a person cannot complain of an injury if they deliberately took the risk.
Back to Top.

The Health and Safety Commission (HSC)

The HSC are appointed by the Secretary for State and consists of a chairperson and nine members. Three are appointed after consultation with employers' organ_isations, three after consultation with employees' organisations and two after consultation with local authorities.
It is the duty of the HSC to:
  • Assist and encourage people in furthering safety
  • Arrange for the carrying out of research and to encourage research and the provision of training and information by others
  • Provide an information and advisory service
  • Submit proposals for regulations
  • Report to and act on directions given by the Secretary for State
  • Liase with local authorities and fire authorities to whom it has delegated some of it's duties
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE)

The HSE, which is appointed by the HSC, has responsibility for implementation. It consists of three persons one of who is the director and has a duty to perform such functions that the HSC directs him to do. For example the HSC may direct the HSE to make a special report on any accident, occurrence or other matter for a general purpose or with a view to making new Regulations.
The HSE employs Inspectors whose main function is to oversee the ways in which organisations try to comply with statutory duties of care and to take action where they find non-conformances.

Local Authorities

Local authorities have delegated powers to bring in specific by-laws. They also employ Environmental Health Officers (EHO's) who have the same powers as HSE inspectors. Environmental Health Officers inspect standards of compliance within offices, shops and non-or light industrial premises.

Fire Authorities

The Fire Authorities carry out inspections of work places and enforce compliance with in particular issues relating to fire risk assessments. They also offer advice on fire precautions and have powers to issue prohibition and improvement notices in the same manner as the HSE and EHO inspectors.

The Scottish Environmental Protection Agency

The Scottish Environmental Protection Agency was established in 1996 by the Environmental Protection Act and laid down its authority and responsibility. The Agency has amongst its duties a responsibility to carry out assessments of existing/potential pollution levels. It will also identify options for prevention/minimisation rather than punishment and compensation for individual offences committed and injuries suffered in connection with occupation of land (e.g. common law nuisance). To some extent this is still the trend today. A similar Agency operatesin England and Wales.

Insurance Companies

There are two forms of insurance that are compulsory. These are Employer's Liability and Motor Insurance. Other types of insurances are optional although few companies would operate without for example, fire insurance.

The trend today is for insurance companies to take a more hands-on approach when underwriting liability and engineering insurance.

Most insurers employ liability surveyors to visit their clients in order to establish the level of safety culture that exists. They will also assess the quality of management system and it's implementation as well as compliance with statutory duties of care.

They will consider the monitoring arrangements within the organisation to identify non-conformances and take corrective action.

The insurer will then recommend an action plan to the insured and whilst these are only recommendations, non-compliance may affect the premiums for insurance and in some instances lead to a cancellation.

Back to Top.

1.5 Sources of information on health and safety

Within an organisation there will be a variety of different sources of information both internal and external:
Internal sources:
  • Drawings of buildings, describing materials, incoming services etc.,
  • Manufacturer's instruction manuals for plant and machinery
  • Maintenance records of plant and machinery
  • Accident and incident investigation records
  • Names of suppliers and service organisations
  • Reports from outside agencies such as HSE, customer audits, and insurance companies
  • Training records
  • Job descriptions
  • Safety policy and arrangements
External sources:
  • Manufacturers handouts and booklets
  • HSC and HSE publications
  • Trades associations
  • International Labour Organisation
  • British standards
  • Internet
  • Encyclopaedias
  • Case law
  • Magazines and newspapers

1.6 The key elements of a health and safety management system

In the HSE publication HSG65 the six main elements for successful health and safety management are listed as:
  • Policy
Having in place a well written and clearly definitive policy with regards to health and safety issues
  • Organisation
Adequate levels of control, communications, competence, co-operation
  • Planning and implementing
Pro-active management planning to ensure all events are adequately managed and active and positive implementation of planning strategy
  • Measuring performance
Active (inspections, sampling or health monitoring etc.,) and re-active (investigating accidents, dangerous incidents, health problems etc.,) monitoring
  • Reviewing performance
Carrying out critical analysis of how well the system of management is functioning with regards to h alth and safety issues
  • Auditing
Carrying out a comprehensive audit to identify non-conformances of or.to the management system and then taking appropriate action to eliminatthe non-conformances.

Back to Top.

Monday 26 March 2012

Health & Safety Legislation

The Legislation that surrounds Health and Safety in the UK is quite far reaching and complex, this is a list that effects the day to day lives of people in industry, this legislation forms the backbone of the Health & Safety ethos we now work with, not that this list is everything, more of its a good place to start and if we can comply with this lot thne will not be too far away fom creating a reasonable safe working environment.

Legislation List of contents

Section No: Description
1
The Legal background
2
The European influence
3
The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act, 1974
4
United Kingdom Regulations
4/1
The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999
4/2
The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (amended 2004)
4/3
The Electricity at Work Regulations 1989
4/4
The Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005
4/5
The Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992
4/6
The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992
4/7
The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998
4/8
The Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998
4.9
The Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992
4/10
The Health and Safety (Display Screen Equipment) Regulations 1992
4/11
The Health and Safety (First Aid) Regulations 1981
4/12
The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrence Regulations 1995
4/13
The Health and Safety (Safety Signs and Signals) Regulations 1996
4/14
The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007
4/15
The Work at Height Regulations 2005
4/16
The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005
4/17
The Confined Spaces Regulations 1997
4/18
The Health and Safety Consultation with Employees Regulations 1996
4/19
The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 in England and Wales and The Fire (Scotland) Act 2005
4/20
The Fire Precautions (Workplace) Regulations  1997 the Amendment Regulations of 1999
4/21
The Dangerous  Substances and Explosive  Atmospheres Regulations 2002 (DSEAR).
4/22
The Safety Representatives and Safety Committee Regulations 1977
4/23
The Health and Safety Information for Employees Regulations 1989
4/24
The Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 1992
4/25
The Chemical(Hazard  Information and Packaging or Supply) Regulations 2002
4/26
The Hazardous Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2005
4/27
The Special Waste Amendment (Scotland) Regulations 2004
4/28
The Environmental Protection Act 1990
5
Approved Codes of Practice
6
Guidance Notes
7
The Concept of Self-Regulation
8
Attitude to new Regulations and/or approved Codes of Practice
9
Supervising and Enforcement
9/1
Enforcing body
9/2
Powers of Inspectors
9/3
Enforcement
9/4
Penalties

1 The Legal Background

Cultural influence
Common law concerning health and safety issues is influenced by what is seen to be the currently acceptable standards of care demanded by society, individuals or corporate bodies.
Standards of care
Standard of care in common law are interpreted by courts of law.
Decisions made by higher courts are binding on lower courts. These are called 'precedents'. Lower court decisions are called 'persuasive' in that they assist in reaching decisions.
House of Lords decisions are binding on all decisions made by lower courts. They can only be overridden by:
  • A decision of Parliament
  • An act of Parliament
  • European court decisions

Civil actions for damages
In the event of a civil action, the following questions are asked:
  • Did the defender owe a duty of care to the claimant?
  • Was there a breach of the duty of care?
  • Did the damages being sued for result directly from the breach of duty?
For the case to be won by the claimant, these three questions must be answered in the affirmative.
Statutory law
Statute laws are Acts of Parliament such as The Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, together with the Regulations, Rules and Orders made within the scope of the Acts.
Modern Acts of Parliament set out principles or objectives and use specific Regulations or Orders to implement the principles/objectives.
Acts of Parliament are Primary or Principal legislation, whereas Regulations made under the Acts are Secondary delegated legislation. By-laws made by local authorities are another example of delegated legislation. Ministers of the Crown make regulations via powers given to them by a Principal Act. Once introduced, they become statute law like the Acts of Parliament and a breach constitutes a criminal offence.
Types of statutory duties
  • Absolute duty - otherwise known as 'Strict Liability'
This duty is imposed by an Act or Regulation where there is a high risk of severe injury or an occurrence that could lead to severe injury. The words 'must' or 'shall' appear in the requirement of the Act or Regulation.
  • Duty to do what is 'Practicable'
Some Regulations state that action must be taken so far as is practicable. To implement this duty, the employer must consider current technological knowledge and feasibility. Some degree of reasonability can be applied and account taken of current practice - but cautiously. 'Practicable' means something less than physically possible.
  • Duty to do all that is 'Reasonably Practicable'
This phrase qualifies almost all of the general duties imposed by the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. It allows a balance to be made between the cost of the action proposed (in terms of money, time or inconvenience) as against the degree of risk associated with the situation being considered.
This is the best that can be achieved, taking account of the balanced judgement of cost against risk. This judgement may have to be defended at sometime, therefore it should always err on the safe side.

Back to index.

2 The European Influence

Most current legislation concerning health, safety and welfare and almost all of what will be future legislation originates within the European Community framework.
E.U. Administration
The administration of the E.U. is carried out through four bodies:
  • The Commission:
  • This is formed of Commissioners representing each of the member states. The Commission administers the law throughout the E.U. similar to that of the U.K. civil service. E.U. legislation originates from the Commission in the form of Directives sent for approval to the Council of Ministers. The Council of Ministers:
This is composed of delegates from each member state. It is similar to the Government of the U.K. and voting is proportional, depending on the size of each country's population. Matters concerning health and safety are subject to qualified majority voting.
  • The European Parliament:
This is formed of representatives elected from constituencies from within member states. It consults and debates on all proposed legislation.
  • European Court of Justice:
This adjudicates upon the law of the EEC and its decision is binding upon all member states' judicial courts by virtue of the EEC Act 1972. It has 13 Judges, including one from each member state. The European Court of Human Rights enforces agreed community standards on the protection of human rights and fundamental freedom.
Elements of EC law:
Apart from the general provisions of the Treaty of Rome (which is signed by all member states), there are three elements of European Law:
  • European Regulations:
These are passed by the Council of Ministers and are adopted immediately into the legal framework of each member state. They are directly imposed upon every citizen living within the EC.

  • Directives:
These set out general objective standards, which must be achieved by member states within a specific time-scale. Member states can decide whether to alter their own individual legal framework to meet the objectives of Directives or adopt them directly. In the UK, the implementation is by Statutory Instruments, i.e. Regulations.
  • Decisions:
These are decisions reached when a matter is taken to the European Courts and affects only the parties directly concerned, although they do set precedents.
Back to index.

3 The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act, 1974

This is the primary piece of legislation on which is based all of our statutory legal requirements concerning health and safety at work. It is an enabling Act in that it sets out objectives to be achieved rather than specific requirements.
The following sections, 2 - 9 contain the main thrust of those requirements.
Section 2:
Employers must take all reasonable care to safeguard the health, safety and welfare of their employees. In particular this means providing and maintaining:
  • Safe plant and systems of work.
  • Safe handling, storage, maintenance and transportation of articles and substances associated with work.
  • Adequate selection of employees and thereafter providing sufficient information, instruction, training and supervision.
  • Safe places of work including access and egress.
  • Safe working environments and adequate welfare facilities. Note how similar these statutory duties are to the five duties of common law.
There is an absolute duty upon employers with more than four employees to prepare, revise as necessary and make known to all staff, a written safety policy detailing a policy of intent and organisational arrangements for implementing it.
Employers must consult with employees on health and safety matters, and where requested to do so by two or more trades union appointed safety representative, set up a safety committee.
The self-employed has similar duties but do not require to have a written safety policy.
Sections 3 & 4:
These sections impose duties of care upon employers towards persons other than employees, e.g. contractors, visitors, self-employed and general public.
Section 5:
Harmful emissions into the atmosphere must be prevented from prescribed operations.
Section 6:
Designers, manufacturers, importers, installers and those who hire out plant and/or equipment have a duty to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the article or substance for use at work is safe when being properly used.
Sufficient tests etc., must be competently carried out to validate the article or substance for use at work.
All necessary information must be provided regarding the article or substance and the safeguards to be observed when using or storing it. Such information should not just be 'made available'.
Section 7 & 8:
Duties are placed upon employees at work to: Take all reasonable care for their own health and safety and the health and safety of anyone who may be affected by their acts or omissions.
  • Co-operate with their employers to meet legal obligations.
  • Neither intentionally nor recklessly interfere with or misuse anything whether plant, equipment or methods of work, provided by their employer to meet obligations under this or any related legislation.
Sections 9:
The employer is not allowed to charge employees for anything done or provided to meet specific statutory requirement

4 United Kingdom Regulations:

There are a considerable number of sets of U.K. Regulations which organisations and individuals must adhere to.
The following is a list of the most common ones together with management action plans.

4/1 The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999

These Regulations may be considered the most important, because they contain the requirement that all work activities must be subject to pro-active risk assessment.
The concept and methodology of carrying out risk assessment are contained in Unit 5 A summary of the requirements of these Regulations is:
  • Requirement to carry out work activity risk assessments and record the findings and safeguards where the risk identified is significant.
  • To have in place effective management control systems.
  • Where necessary to carry out appropriate health surveillance.
  • To ensure that managers have appropriate competent people to assist them on matters related to health and safety.
  • Contingency planning in place to deal with serious and/or imminent danger.
  • Requirement to give employees comprehensive and relevant information regarding health and safety issues.
  • Requirement for inter-employer co-operation where necessary. (e.g. between contractors and clients or other contractors etc.,)
  • Adequate employee selection criteria which includes a capability assessment.
  • To ensure that all training incorporates health and safety considerations.
  • To give special consideration to assess risks to new or expectant mothers and their children.
  • To give special consideration to assess risks to young persons.
  • Requirement for employees to co-operate with employers in managing health and safety issues. This includes working in accordance with information, instruction and training.
Back to index.

4/2 The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations 2002 (amended 2004)

Hazardous substances may be natural or man made and include chemicals, biochemicals such as pesticides, growth hormones and process hazards.
There are six stages of control. These are:
  1. Hazard identification
    • This is normally obtained from
    • Information received from suppliers through labels or substance data sheets.
    • Information regarding processes. (e.g. dust, fumes or gasses etc.)
    • Information from data regarding natural hazards from plants, animals, certain materials (e.g. foam rubbers or fungicide treatment in wallpaper pastes etc.,)
  2. Risk assessment
  3. This requires knowledge of how a substance is used or a process takes place.
    Assessments should, where possible, be carried out before the substance is brought into the work place and used.
    Assessments should also consider handling, storage, use, disposal and the effects on the environment.
  4. Risk control
  5. This involves considering the steps that are already in place to deal with the risk/s and considering what other steps can or should be taken to eliminate the risk or reduce it by means of substitution, alternative work procedures, total enclosure, local exhaust ventilation, dilution ventilation or personal protective equipment etc.
  6. Competence of personnel
  7. This entails proper selection of personnel, providing them with adequate information, instruction and training. Such training must include supervisors, whose job it is to ensure employees are properly applying the information, instruction and training given.
  8. Monitoring
  9. It is necessary to regularly monitor the effectiveness of application of the management system in place. This may include the need for regular health surveillance.
  10. Records
  11. Adequate records of assessments, maintenance of plant, monitoring and health surveillance are required to be kept.

4/3 The Electricity at Work Regulations 1989

Electrical dangers can result in:
  • The Regulations require an employer to:
  • assess the risks to employees from noise at work;
  • take action to reduce the noise exposure that produces those risks;
  • Electric shock.
  • Electric burns
  • Electrical fires
  • Explosions
These Regulations include:
  • Requirement regarding the need to properly construct and maintain equipment
  • Need for care when working on or near electrical equipment
  • Need to provide adequate protective equipment
  • Proper care in bringing equipment into service
  • Adequate protection of equipment
  • Precautions relating to conductors
  • Satisfactory protection from excessive current
  • Need for satisfactory switch off and effective isolation procedures
  • Restriction of work on live equipment unless absolutely necessary
  • Provision of adequate space, access and lighting when working on equipment
  • Personnel carrying out electrical work must be competent and/or adequately supervised
Back to index.

4/4 The Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005

The Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005 require employers to prevent or reduce risks to health and safety from exposure to noise at work. Employees have duties under the Regulations too.
  • provide employees with hearing protection if they cannot reduce the noise exposure enough by using other methods;
  • make sure the legal limits on noise exposure are not exceeded;
  • provide employees with information, instruction and training;
  • carry out health surveillance where there is a risk to health. The Regulations do not apply to:
  • members of the public exposed to noise from their non-work activities, or making an informed choice to go to noisy places;
  • low-level noise which is a nuisance but causes no risk of hearing damage.
Employers in the music and entertainment sectors have until 6 April 2008 to comply with the Noise Regulations 2005. Meanwhile they must continue to comply with the Noise at Work Regulations 1989, which the 2005 Regulations replace for all other workplaces.
The Noise Regulations require employers to take specific action at certain action values. These relate to:
  • the levels of exposure to noise for employees averaged over a working day or week; and
  • the maximum noise (peak sound pressure) to which employees are exposed in a working day. The values are:
  • lower exposure action values: — daily or weekly exposure of 80 dB; — peak sound pressure of 135 dB;
  • upper exposure action values: — daily or weekly exposure of 85 dB; — peak sound pressure of 137 dB.
There are also levels of noise exposure which must not be exceeded:
  • exposure limit values: — daily or weekly exposure of 87 dB; — peak sound pressure of 140 dB.
These exposure limit values take account of any reduction in exposure provided by hearing protection.

4/5 The Personal Protective Equipment at Work (PPE) Regulations 1992

Summary of the requirements:
  • Provision of PPE must be as a last resort.
  • A suitable assessment must be made to ensure that the equipment supplied is:
  • Appropriate for the risk and environment in which it will be used
  • Ergonomically sound and compatible with the user
  • Capable of fitting the wearer after adjustment
  • Effective in eliminating or controlling the risk without leading to any other increased risks so far as is reasonably practicable
  • Compatible with current E.U. and U.K. Standards
  • Items of PPE must be compatible with each other where more than one piece is worn.
  • There must be adequate maintenance of PPE and satisfactory replacement arrangements.
  • Users must be given sufficient information, instruction and training.
  • Employers must take all reasonable steps to ensure that PPE provided is being properly used.
  • Employees must report the loss of, or any defects in, PPE to their employers.
  • No charge can be made for PPE that is required, and used only at work. (Section 9 of HSW Act 1974)
Back to index.

4/6 The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992

Summary of the requirements:
  • The workplace must be properly maintained and kept reasonably clean.
  • The working environment must be subject to adequate controls; e.g. lighting, ventilation, temperature, humidity, quality of air etc.,
  • Employees must be given an adequate workspace allocation.
  • Consideration must be given to ensuring the ergonomic design and arrangements of workstations are satisfactory.
  • There must be adequate pedestrian and traffic routes.
  • Protection shall be provided to prevent the fall of persons or things.
  • All glazing must be properly designed and maintained with adequate arrangements for cleaning in place.
  • All doors and gates must be suitably constructed designed and located.
  • All travelators and escalators must be safe by design, adequately functional and properly maintained.
  • There must be:
  • A ready supply of wholesome drinking water.
  • Adequate accommodation for clothing and facilities for changing.
  • Adequate facilities for resting and meals.

4/7 The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998

Summary of requirements:
  • Equipment must be suitable and fit for purpose
  • Equipment must be adequately maintain
  • Consideration of inspection requirements must be made
  • Equipment must only be used by authorised persons
  • Need to ensure operators, maintenance staff and supervisors are given adequate information, instruction and training
  • Requirement to reduce the risks associated with equipment
  • Requirement to ergonomically design and install both the work equipment and it's control systems
  • All equipment must have an identifiable means of isolation from power sources
  • All equipment should have clear warning and warning devices as appropriate to ensure health and safety arrangements are satisfactory
  • All equipment bought from 1 January 1993 to conform to E.U. safety standards i.e. marked with the CE stamps.
NB. There are approved codes of practice covering specific types of equipment e.g. wood working machines and power presses.
Back to index.

4/8 The Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment (LOLER) Regulations 1998

Note: All lifting equipment must conform to these Regulations in addition to meeting the requirements of the PUWER Regulations.
Summary of requirements:

  • All lifting operations must be planned by a 'competent person'.
  • All lifting equipment must be assessed to decide if it requires a periodic examination by a 'competent person'.
When the decision is in the affirmative, the employer must either:
  1. Have the equipment examined at intervals prescribed in the Regulations, or,
  2. At shorter intervals as decided by the 'competent person', or,
  3. At intervals specified in a 'scheme of examination'.
Note:
'Competent person' is in this case usually an inspection organisation who would normally carry out the statutory examination and testing of lifting machinery.
The same body would also normally draw up 'Schemes of examination'.

4/9 The Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992

Summary of requirements:
  • Avoidance where reasonable of all manual handling Thereafter to:-
  • Mechanise or automate the process, so far as is reasonably practicable
  • That is, engineer out or reduce manual handling activities Once this has been done:
  • Carry out a risk assessment
  • Reduce risks, so far as is reasonably practicable, by changing or modifying the loads/objects or changing the system of work
  • Give employees and supervisors sufficient recorded information, instruction and training
  • Ensure adequate supervision
  • Review the situation periodically in the light of state of the art technology and knowledge

4/10 The Health and Safety (Display Screen Equipment) Regulations 1992

Summary of requirements:
  • Employers must comply with the schedule of requirements. This is normally achieved by carrying out a risk assessment of the workstations.
  • Consideration of schedule items. That is display screen, keyboard, work-desk and surface, work chair, space requirements, lighting, reflection/glare, noise, heat, light, humidity, radiation (but no action necessary) and computer/user interface.
  • Consideration of work breaks and activity changes for users.
  • Requirements for eye and eyesight tests and possible corrective action.
  • Adequate recorded information, instruction and training for users and supervisors.
Back to index.

4/11 The Health and Safety (First Aid) Regulations 1981

Summary of requirements:
Every employer must provide equipment and facilities that are adequate and appropriate in the circumstances for administering 'First Aid'.
To ensure compliance, employers must make an assessment to determine their needs. Consideration of the following is required:
  • Consider different types of work activities
The needs will be determined by the nature of the work being carried out. For example high or low risk of serious injuries.
  • Consider the access to professional treatment.
If ambulances, paramedics, doctors etc., are a distance away, a first aid room may be appropriate.
  • Consider employees working away from base:
The nature of risk and availability of assistance will require to be considered.
  • Where employees of more than one employer are working together, shared facilities may be considered.
  • There may be a need to consider non-employees.
Although the Regulations do not require employers to make provision for non-employees, it may be prudent to do so because of the general duties of care under HSW Act'74.
Having made these assessments, the employer will be able to establish how many first aid boxes and/or other facilities are necessary.
The employer must ensure that adequate numbers of suitable persons are available to administer first aid. 'Suitable persons are those who have obtained qualifications approved by the HSE.
Important Note: In appointing such personnel, other considerations should be taken into account to ensure they are suitable. For example:
  • Have they any phobias? Such as fear of blood or heights or confined spaces.
  • Are they physically fit?
  • Can they mentally deal with pressure and trauma?
  • Employees must be informed of the location of first aid facilities, who the first alders are, and how to contact them.
Back to index.

4/12 The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995

These Regulations require the reporting of prescribed injuries etc., to the enforcing authority.
These include:
  • Where a person dies at work.
  • Where a person suffers a prescribed injury or condition at work, or there is a dangerous occurrence.
These are prescribed in an appendix to the Regulations.
Reporting must be by the quickest possible means, normally by telephone. Thereafter the enforcing authority may request the employer to send a written report to them.
Where an employee's injuries result in them being unable to carry out their normal work activities for more than three calendar days. In this case, a written report on an approved form (F2508) within ten days will suffice.
The enforcing authority is the body responsible for the enforcement of health and safety in the premises where the injury, disease or dangerous occurrence took place.
Usually the enforcing authority will be:
  • The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) Inspectors, for industrial/construction type premises.
  • The Local authority (Environmental Health Officers (EHO's), for offices, shops and non­industrial premises.
Reporting to next of Kin
While this type of reporting is not covered by law it is most important.
Urgent reporting is required when someone suffers a life threatening or severe injury. Among the things to be considered are:
  • Is there an up-to-date list of the contact person that each employee wants any life threatening type injury to be reported to?
  • Does the information include contact phone numbers or addresses during probable working hours?
  • Does the information include any special needs? For example special bloods groups, desire not to have surgery or blood transfusions etc.?
The latter can be due to religious beliefs etc.,
  • Is the required information readily to hand? For example, at weekends or during overtime periods etc.,
Reporting to Insurers
It is imperative that the insurers are notified as soon as possible after an accident which may result in a claim being made. This will enable information to be gathered while events are fresh in people's minds.
Back to index.

4/13 The Health and Safety (Safety Signs and Signals) Regulations 1996

Under these Regulations safety signs are standardised in terms of geometric form, colour, symbols and wording.
There are five kinds of safety signs in general use. These are:
  • Prohibition:- That is, where certain behaviour is prohibited
  • Warning:- Gives warning of a hazard
  • Mandatory:- Indicates a certain course of action
  • Emergency escape/ first aid exit signs and first aid information
  • Fire equipment:- The siting of fire fighting equipment Each sign may have a pictorial symbol and/or wording on the sign

4/14 The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 (CDM)

In summary, the new Regulations require:
  • A realistic project programme, allowing adequate time for planning, preparation and the work itself
  • Early appointment of key people
  • Competent duty holders, with sufficient resources to meet their legal duties
  • Early identification and reduction of risks to health and safety
  • Provision of health and safety information from the start of the design phase, through construction and maintenance and eventual demolition phases, so everyone can discharge their duties effectively
  • Co-operation between duty-holders
  • Proportionate effort and resources to be applied to managing health and safety issues.
The AcoP gives practical guidance on how to comply with the legal requirements and improve site safety and also sets out the main changes and redefined roles and responsibilities under CDM 2007.
Clients
Clients now have to ensure they assume their responsibilities early in the project. As before, the need to appoint proven team members is spelt out, and guidance is given on how to ensure that `duty holders' are competent to undertake the project.
From the initial design stage, the client must appoint a CDM co-coordinator who will 'notify' the project if it is relevant; if there is any delay in this appointment, and then the role defaults to the client. 'Initial design' is defined simply as 'any actions that cannot be changed later', but it is expected that measures will be in place by the time the project enters the feasibility stage. Clients must also ensure that construction does not start until the health-and-safety plan is in place, and that appropriate welfare provisions are available.
Other significant duties include:
  • Ensuring that any fixed 'workplace'
  • Complies with the 'Workplace (health, safety and welfare) regulations 1992'.
  • Checking the competence of employees and all team members.
  • Ensuring that all parties fulfill their responsibilities.
  • Ensuring suitable management is in place.
  • Allowing sufficient time and resources.
  • Providing and disseminating pre-construction information to the team.
  • Appointing a CDMC.
  • Appointing a principal contractor.
  • Ensuring that construction does not start until a suitable welfare and construction phase plan is in place.
  • Providing information for the health and safety file.
  • Preparing, or instructing others to prepare, the health and safety file.
  • Retaining, and allowing access, to the file.
Additionally, CDM duties now apply in competition entries, concept designs, and bids for grants
Designers
The designers' duties can be summarised as:
  • Involving all of the team members and co-coordinating with them, to ensure that all points of view are understood.
  • As before, designers must make sure the client is aware of his responsibilities at the earliest opportunity.
  • Ensuring that welfare provisions for the project are in accordance with the Regulations.
  • Considering health and safety at the workplace being designed.
  • Ensuring that they are competent to undertake the health and safety issues.
  • Checking that clients are aware of their duties.
  • Ensuring that, during design work, all hazards are identified and eliminated and that information concerning remaining hazards is communicated to those who may need to know.
  • Considering the risks to others in the construction phase.

CDM Co-coordinator Co-coordinators duties can be summarised as:
  • Advising clients as to their duties under the Regulations.
  • Notifying the project to the HSE.
  • Ensuring that the flow of health and safety information is managed correctly and efficiently.
  • Ensuring that the client is advised of the quality of the construction phase plan and information.
  • Liaising with the designers and the contractor.
  • Ensuring that information on cleaning maintenance is included.
  • Ensuring that co-operation and co-ordination take place for the duration of the project.
Identifying and ensuring the collection of all pre-construction information, and informing the client if additional work is required to assemble this information.
  • Ensuring that the pre-construction information is made available to the team.
  • Ensuring that risks are identified and eliminated in relation to the potential harm that they could cause.
Back to index.
Contractors
The responsibilities of contractors remain very similar to the previous provisions, and can be characterised as follows:
  • Developing the health and safety construction plan using information provided by the design team.
  • Taking control of the site and site operations.
  • Ensuring co-operation between the team contractors and consultants.
  • Co-operating with, and informing the CDMC to allow the production of an appropriate health and safety file.
  • Improving the planning and management of the project from the start.
  • Identifying hazards early on, to allow them to be eliminated or reduced at the design and planning stage, and to allow any remaining risks to be properly managed.
  • Targeting effort where it can do most good in terms of health and safety.
  • Discouraging unnecessary bureaucracy and paperwork.
  • Checking that clients are aware of their duties.
  • Ensuring the competence of the team employed by the contractor.
  • Planning, managing and monitoring their work to ensure safe practice.
  • Ensuring that every contractor works safely.
  • Ensuring that any design work is undertaken in compliance with designers' duties.
  • Ensuring co-operation and co-ordination with the whole team.
  • Ensuring welfare provisions are in place at the beginning of the construction phase. On 'notifiable' projects, the contractor should also:
  • Ensure that the client understands their duties, that a co-coordinator is appointed, and that the HSE is notified.
  • Make sure that they are competent to undertake the project and to handle the issues that will be encountered.
  • Ensure that the construction phase is properly planned in all respects.
  • Ensure safe methods of working.
  • Ensure that the construction phase is planned before construction begins and communicating the plan to all who are involved. The plan must also be implemented and updated as the project progresses.
  • Ensure that welfare facilities are in place.
  • Liaise with the CDMC to ensure that any design work during the construction phase is undertaken in accordance with the designers' duties.
  • Issue relevant information to the CDMC.
  • Ensure that the workforce is consulted on health and safety matters.
  • Display the project notification.
Competence
Previously, competence was an issue attracting varied and copious amounts of paperwork. The new Regulations seek to make this much more straightforward and to ensure that effort is not wasted, whilst also ensuring that the team is sufficiently experienced to undertake the responsibilities required under CDM 2007.
The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 (2004)
These Regulations are now part of the CDM requirements and therefore must be considered on every relevant project.
Regulation 9 requires that any project designed as a 'workplace' takes account of these Regulations.
They are set out in Schedule 2 of CDM 2007, and are to be found towards the back of the ACoP. The main headings and areas to be covered include:
Referenced in Schedule 2 -
  • Sanitary conveniences
  • Washing facilities
  • Drinking water
  • Changing rooms and lockers
  • Facilities for rest
The Regulations, in detail, cover:
  • Safe places of work
  • Good order and site security
  • Stability of structures
  • Demolition or dismantling
  • Explosives
  • Excavations
  • Cofferdams and caissons
  • Reports and inspections
  • Energy distribution installations
  • Prevention of drowning
  • Traffic routes
  • Vehicles
  • Preventions of risk from fire etc.
  • Emergency procedures
  • Emergency routes and exits
  • Fire detection and fire fighting
  • Fresh air
  • Temperature and weather protection
  • Lighting
CDM Documentation
The key to CDM compliance is not in the documentation, but the effective planning and management of the construction project.
Construction phase plan
It is important that the plan is both proportionate and appropriate. It is not a pre- requisite of CDM to have a large complicated document full of generic information for each and every project. Appendix 3 of the CDM ACoP gives detailed information on the scope and content of this plan.
Health and safety file
A health and safety file must be prepared by the CDM co-coordinator for every structure within a construction project. The file's purpose is to inform owners, occupiers or managers of the completed structure of:
  • the 'as built' drawings, rather than those produced in the original design how the structure was built
  • details of the structure's equipment, including manuals or instructions on how it should be maintained
  • maintenance procedures for the structure itself
  • details of the structure's utilities, including information on fire fighting systems and other emergency arrangements.
It is the duty of the CDM co-coordinator to create and maintain an evolving Health and safety file for use by the structure's eventual user or occupier.

The Principal contractor also has a duty to ensure that information is added into the Health and safety file until the termination of the construction phase.
The client's responsibility for the Health and safety file is only discharged when he disposes of his entire interest in the structure. The Health and safety file thus endures with the structure and should be added to throughout its life.
Back to index.

4/15 The Work at Height Regulations 2005

These Regulations came into force on 6th April 2005. The principle objective of these Regulations is to eliminate, where possible, working at height and where this is not possible to ensure the work is carried out safely using appropriate equipment such as ladders, access platforms, scaffolds or rope systems. Other safeguards such as safety nets, harnesses, notices, barriers and exclusion zones should also be considered.
The work should only be carried out by those who have the necessary training.
Many of the requirements within these Regulations are already contained in legislation specific to the construction industry. In the WAHR'05 all working at height is covered and the requirements are not limited to any specific height or type of equipment.
WAHR'05 requires all employees and the self-employed to put in place arrangements to:
  • Eliminate or minimise risks associated with working at height.
  • Ensure work at height is properly organised, planned and adequately supervised
  • Select work equipment that is suitable to carry out the proposed work at height.
In selecting the equipment and system of work the principles of risk assessment must be applied. Assessments must be proportionate to the harm that could occur if no action is taken.
Where work at height cannot be eliminated/avoided safe means of access/egress must be given all due consideration.
All equipment used must be regularly inspected and properly maintained.
Note that ladders can only be used if a risk assessment under the Management Regulations has demonstrated that the use of more suitable work equipment is not justified because of the low risk and;
  • The short duration of use or,
  • Existing features of the site which cannot be altered.
There is a requirement to carry out risk assessments with specific contents when it is intended to use:
  • Demonstrate that the work can so far as is reasonably practicable be performed safely while using the system.
  • Justify that the use as against other safer work equipment is not reasonably practicable.
  • The user has enough personnel who have received adequate training specific to the operations envisaged including rescue procedures.
A change in handrail height
The WAHR'05 require that handrails for construction work require a height of 950mm. this is an increase from the previous height of 910mm. Where existing handrails are fixed in place they can be left at that height until changed. Any gap between top rail and intermediate rail should not exceed 470mm. Toe boards shall be suitable and sufficient.
Back to index.

4/16 The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005

These Regulations came into force on the 6th July 2005 and require employers to:
  • Assess the vibration risks to their employees.
  • Decide if employees are likely to be exposed above the daily exposure action value (EAV) and if they are:
  • To introduce a programme of controls to eliminate risk, or reduce exposure to as low a level as is reasonably practicable.
  • Provide health surveillance (regular health checks) to those employees who continue to be regularly exposed above the action values or otherwise continue to be at risk.
  • Prove Information, instruction and training to employees on health risks and actions you are taking to control those risks.
  • Consult with trades union or worker representatives on your proposals to control risks and to provide health surveillance.
  • Keep a record of risk assessments and control actions.
  • Keep health records for employees under health surveillance.
  • Review and update risk assessments regularly.

In these Regulations:
Daily Exposure means the quantity of mechanical vibration to which a worker is exposed during a working day, normalised to an eight hour exposure period taking account of the magnitude and duration of the vibration.
Exposure Action Value (EAV) is a daily amount of exposure above which employers are required to take action to control exposure. The greater the exposure level, the greater the risk and the more action the employers need to take to reduce the risk.
Exposure Limit Value (ELV) is the maximum amount of vibration an employee may be exposed to on any single day.
Any employee who carries out work which is liable to expose his/her employees to risk from vibrations must make a suitable and sufficient assessment of the risk created by the work to the health and safety of these employees. The risk assessment must identify the measures that need to be taken to meet the requirements of the Regulations.
The risk assessment must assess daily exposure to vibrations by means of: Observations of specific work practices
Reference to relevant information on the probable magnitude of the vibration corresponding to the equipment used in the particular working condition, and
If necessary measurement of the magnitude of vibration to which employees are liable to be exposed.
What should be done?
Employers should start by identifying if there is a risk of significant exposure from hand-held vibration. This can be done by:
  • Which, if any, processes involve regular exposure to vibrations.
  • Checking if there are any signs or warnings of vibration risks in equipment handbooks.
  • Ask employees if they have any of the hand-held vibration symptoms (HAVS) or if the equipment they use produces high levels of vibration or uncomfortable strains on arms and/or hands.

All of this will involve consultation.

4/17 The Confined Spaces Regulations 1997

Confined spaces are defined as any place where a person may be at significant risk and from which access is restricted.
The principal requirements are:
  • No person shall enter a confined space to carry out work for any purpose unless it is not reasonably practicable to achieve the purpose without such entry.
  • Before entry, employers must carry out a risk assessment of the work activity.

No person shall enter, or carry out work in, or leave a confined space other than in accordance with a system of work that renders the work safe and without undue risk to the health and safety of the person.

Back to index.

4/18 The Health and Safety (Consultation with Employees) Regulations 1996

These Regulations apply to organisations with employees not represented by trade unions. The Regulations require employers to consult with their employees on matters which affect, or could affect, their health and safety.
Basically they give the same rights to non-union personnel as those given to trade union members by previous Regulations. In some instances they expand or reinforce previous duties.
The duties of employers:
The duty of employers is to consult with employees in good time on matters relating to their health and safety at work.
NB. 'In good time' means consultation so that the employees views can be taken into account before decisions are taken.
In particular consultation regarding:
The introduction of any measures at the workplace which may substantially affect the health and safety of employees.
NB Employers must provide enough information to allow employees to understand:
  • What the likely hazards and risks arising from their work or changes to their work are.
  • The measures in place or about to be introduced to deal with the hazards/risks.
  • What employees ought to do when encountering hazards/risks including what to do in an emergency?
  • The employers arrangements for the appointment, or nomination, of persons to assist in carrying out risk assessments under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.
  • Any health and safety information the employer requires to provide under relevant statutory provisions. For example, the written safety policy and arrangements.
  • The planning and organisation of any health and safety training the employer is duty bound to provide under statutory provisions.
  • The health and safety consequences for employees from the introduction of new technologies into the workplace. Employees have a choice on how to consult For example:
  • Consult through one or more freely elected representatives of the workforce.
  • If no elected representatives are appointed, consult directly with the employees. N.B. What matters is that employees, or their appointed representatives are made aware of:
  • When their views are being sought regarding health and safety issues.
  • Their rights to take part in discussions on all questions relating to their health and safety.
Safety representatives are entitled to:
  • Adequate training (in-house or external).
  • Time off with pay to carry out their functions, or to attend training.
  • Adequate facilities to allow him/her to carry out their functions.
  • View specific documentation which concerns health and safety issues. Important note; care must be taken not to identify individuals without their consent.

4/19 The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 in England and Wales and The Fire (Scotland) Act 2005

The objective of the legislation is to consolidate the general fire safety precautions of a large number of pieces of legislation, which are revoked. This includes the Fire Certificate (Special Premises) Regulations 1976, thus removing the requirement for fire certificates. In general the legislation places responsibility for enforcing general fire precautions on the local Fire Authorities.
The legislation introduces a risk-based approach, in contrast to the prescriptive requirements associated with the special premises regulations. This requires the Responsible Person to carry out a risk assessment to demonstrate that the fire safety precautions are adequate.
The principles of prevention that are identified in the legislation are similar to generic risk assessment guidance ­avoidance, replacing dangerous by less dangerous materials, provision of protective measures etc.
The approach to be followed in providing general fire precautions:
  • avoiding risks;
  • evaluating the risks which cannot be avoided;
  • combating the risks at source;
  • adapting to technical progress;
  • reducing the dangerous by the non-dangerous or less dangerous;
  • developing a coherent overall prevention policy which covers technology, organisation of work and the influence of factors relating to the work environment;
  • giving collective protective measures priority over individual measures; and
  • giving appropriate instructions to employees.
Back to index.

4/20 The Fire Precautions (Workplace) (FPW) Regulations 1997 including the requirements of the FPW Amendment Regulations 1999

These Regulations apply to all workplaces except for certain ones including:
  • Workplaces used only by self-employed people.
  • Private dwellings.
  • Workplaces in or on a construction site to which the Construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996 apply
  • Agriculture or forestry land situated away from the undertaking's main building. Note: There is now no lower limit of occupants of premises under which the legislation applies. These regulations require:
  • That a fire risk assessment be carried out.
  • There is adequate training to ensure that the fire precautions in place can be correctly used.
NB The regulations do not state how the training is to be given, however to ensure that it is effective, training should be given verbally and in writing, to all persons employed, including temporary staff.

4/21 The Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 (DSEAR).

DSEAR requires employers to assess the risks of fires and explosions that may be caused by dangerous substances in the workplace. These risks must then be eliminated or reduced as far as is reasonably practicable. The aim is to protect employees and other people who may be put at risk, such as visitors to the workplace and members of the public. The Regulations complement the requirement to manage risks under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.
DSEAR places duties on employers (and the self-employed, who are considered employers for the purposes of the Regulations) to assess and eliminate or reduce risks from dangerous substances. Complying with DSEAR involves:
  1. Assessing risks
  2. Preventing or controlling risks
  3. Where the risk cannot be eliminated, DSEAR requires control measures to be applied in the following priority order:
    • reduce the quantity of dangerous substances to a minimum;
    • avoid or minimise releases of dangerous substances;
    • control releases of dangerous substances at source;
    • prevent the formation of a dangerous atmosphere;
    • collect, contain and remove any releases to a safe place (for example, through ventilation);
    • avoid ignition sources;
    • avoid adverse conditions (for example, exceeding the limits of temperature or control settings)
    that could lead to danger;
    • keep incompatible substances apart.

  4. Mitigation
  5. In addition to control measures DSEAR requires employers to put mitigation measures in place. These measures should be consistent with the risk assessment and appropriate to the nature of the activity or operation and include:
    • reducing the number of employees exposed to the risk;
    • providing plant that is explosion resistant;
    • providing explosion suppression or explosion relief equipment;
    • taking measures to control or minimise the spread of fires or explosions;
    • providing suitable personal protective equipment.

  6. Preparing emergency plans and procedures
  7. Providing information, instruction and training for employees
Back to index.

4/22 The Safety Representative and Safety Committee Regulations 1977

The Safety Representative and Safety Committee Regulations 1977 provided a set of entitlements to consultation to nominees (safety representatives) of recognised independent trade unions. They gave the right to safety representatives to make a number of inspections, to consult with the employer and to receive information on health and safety matters. The Regulations also provide for training, time off with pay to carry out the functions of safety representation and the right to require the employer to form a safety committee subject to certain requirements.
The roles of trade union safety representatives are:
  • to investigate possible dangers at work, the causes of accidents, complaints by employees on health and safety and welfare issues and to take these matters up with the employer
  • to carry out inspections of the workplace particularly following accidents, diseases or other events
  • to represent employees in discussions with health and safety inspectors and to receive information from those inspectors
  • to go to meetings of safety committees
The employer must set up a safety committee if two or more trade union safety representatives ask for one.

4/23 The Health and Safety Information for Employees Regulations 1989

The Health and Safety Information for Employees Regulations 1989 require employers to provide their employees with certain basic information concerning their health, safety and welfare at work. This information is contained in both a poster and a leaflet approved by HSE. Employers can comply with their duty by either displaying the poster or providing employees with a copy of the leaflet.
Employers have 2 principal duties under the Regulations:
  • either to display the poster OR to distribute the leaflet
  • to provide further information giving details of the enforcing authority for the premises and the local address for the Employment Medical Advisory Service (EMAS)

4/24 The Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 1992

These Regulations apply to all new machinery manufactured or supplied in the UK, wherever it is to be used in the European Economic Area (EEA) (The European Economic Area comprises all EU and European Free Trade Area (EFTA) countries with the exception of Switzerland.) The term 'machinery' is broadly defined and includes what is generally understood by the term, as well as some other products.
These regulations require all UK manufacturers and suppliers of new machinery to make sure that the machinery which they supply is safe. They also require manufacturers to make sure that:
  • machinery meets relevant essential health and safety requirements (these are listed in detail in the Regulations), which include the provision of sufficient instructions
  • a technical file for the machinery has been drawn up, and in certain cases, the machinery has been type-examined by a notified body
  • there is a 'declaration of conformity' (or in some cases a 'declaration of incorporation') for the machinery, which should be issued with it
  • there is CE marking affixed to the machinery (unless it comes with a declaration of incorporation).
Back to index.

4/25 The Chemical (Hazard Information and Packaging for Supply) Regulations 2002

These regulations are commonly known as CHIP.
CHIP is the law that applies to suppliers of dangerous chemicals. Its purpose is to protect people and the environment from the effects of those chemicals by requiring suppliers to provide information about the dangers and to package them safely.
CHIP requires the supplier of a dangerous chemical to:
  • identify the hazards (dangers) of the chemical.
  • give information about the hazards to their customers. Suppliers usually provide this information on the package itself (e.g. a label) and, if supplied for use at work, in a safety data sheet
  • package the chemical safely

4/26 The Hazardous Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2005

The new Hazardous Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2005 were implemented in July 2005 and replaced the existing Special Waste Regulations 1996.
The term 'special waste' was replaced by the term 'hazardous waste'. (In Scotland, 'special waste' and 'hazardous waste' have the same meaning).
A number of types of waste not previously considered to be hazardous, including televisions, computer monitors, fluorescent lighting and end-of-life vehicles are now classified as hazardous.
Since July 2005, most producers of hazardous waste in England and Wales have been required to notify their premises to the Environment Agency.
In Northern Ireland and Scotland, there is no need to register, but pre-notification of Hazardous Waste movements are still required.
It is an offence for hazardous waste to be collected from a site that has not been registered.
The Regulations also ban the mixing of hazardous waste and state that it must be stored separately on site. Registration as a Hazardous Waste producer places a statutory duty on the EA to inspect the site where the hazardous waste arises.

4/27 The Special Waste Amendment (Scotland) Regulations 2004

The introduction of the Special Waste Amendment (Scotland) Regulations 2004 introduced legislation that applies only to Scotland and provides a definition for special waste that aligns it with the term hazardous waste.
Special Waste is so called because it has hazardous properties that may render it harmful to human health or the environment. Examples of wastes classed as Special Waste include:
  • asbestos;
  • lead-acid batteries;
  • electrical equipment containing hazardous components such as cathode ray tubes;
  • oily sludges;
  • solvents;
  • fluorescent light tubes;
  • chemical wastes; and
  • pesticides.
In England, there has been some confusion between what is classed as Hazardous waste and that classed as Special waste. However, In Scotland, Special Waste and Hazardous Waste now have the same meaning because, under Scottish law, 'Special Waste' is any waste which is Hazardous Waste as defined by the European Hazardous Waste Directive.

To comply with the Special Waste Regulations employers must ensure that:
  • waste is stored correctly and should ensure that they do not mix different types of special waste and ensure that special waste is properly segregated from other waste types. One item of special waste in a skip of household waste will require the whole skip to be treated as special waste;
  • they select a waste disposal contractor authorised to transport special waste and check their registration documents;
  • obtain a copy of the Waste Management Licence/permit for final destination of your waste and satisfy yourself that this site is authorised to process your waste;
  • obtain a Consignment Note and unique code from SEPA. Often the waste carrier will do this on your behalf as part of their waste collection service.
A copy of the Consignment Note should be retained for a minimum of 3 years from the date on which the transfer occurred.
Back to index.

4/28 The Environmental Protection Act 1990

The aim of the Act is to prevent the pollution from emissions to air, land or water from work processes.
The Environmental Protection Act 1990: Part 1 introduced important new controls aimed at limiting and preventing pollution from a wide range of industries in Great Britain - from power stations, oil refineries, municipal and clinical waste incinerators to re-spraying of road vehicles, maggot breeding and crematoria.
Those industries with the greatest potential to discharge polluting substances to air, land and water (called Part A processes) are subject to Integrated Pollution Control (IPC) and are regulated by the Environment Agency in England and Wales and by the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency in Scotland.
IPC's aims were to achieve a balance between air, land and water pollution. For example, in controlling pollution to air, account should be taken of the effect that the chosen control method will have on land or water - the Best Practicable Environmental Option must be selected.
Certain industries, known as Part B processes, are regulated by Local Authorities in England and Wales for Local Air Pollution Control only. Local Authorities are also responsible for control of smoke, noise and other nuisances.

5 Approved Codes of Practice

These are brought in to supplement statutory legislation such as Acts and Regulations.
They give guidance on the general requirements and explain how the requirements can best be adequately implemented. This effectively allows standards to be kept current by altering the ACOP rather than having to amend the legislation.
Failure to comply with an ACOP is not in itself an offence, but failure is held to be proof of contravention unless the defender can show the compliance was achieved in some other way.
The test would be that the 'other way' did not in any way circumvent the element of care in the ACOP.

6 Guidance Notes

These are issued by the HSE as opinions of good practice. They have no legal force, but because of their origin would be 'persuasive' in practice with lower courts, and useful in civil cases to establish reasonable standards of care.
Back to index.

7 The concept of 'Self Regulation'

Self-regulation is about making a judgement as to what action is required to adequately deal with risks to the health and safety of individuals. The action must eliminate the risk or at least reduce it to tolerable levels.
In the event of the judgement being challenged, the onus would be on the defender to show that their decision had been reasonable and logical, based upon all the facts including the degree of danger and risk involved.

8 Attitude to new Regulations and/or ACOP

Employers often cringe when new Regulations or ACOP are enacted. In fact the very opposite should be the case. In 'self regulation', employers, and in particular managers, are expected to decide for themselves what is reasonable, logical and defendable. ACOP are drawn up by a committee of experienced competent personnel who explain in some detail exactly what standards of care would be excepted as being 'reasonable'.
Back to index.

9 Supervision and enforcement

9/1 Enforcing body

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is the enforcement body of the Health and Safety Commission (HSC).
The HSC consists of ten members appointed by the Government from industry, trade unions, local authorities and other interested groups (currently consumers). The HSE have their own team of enforcement officers (inspectors). For lower risk activities and premises such as offices and retail outlets, the powers of enforcement are delegated to local authority environmental departments, whose officers (EHOs) have the same powers as HSE inspectors.

9/2 Powers of inspectors An appointed inspector can:

  • Gain access, without a warrant, to a workplace at any reasonable time.
  • Employ police to assist them, where necessary.
  • Take equipment, etc on to premises to assist in investigations.
  • Carry out examinations and investigations as deemed necessary.
  • Direct that locations remain undisturbed for as long as he/she deems necessary.
  • Take measurements, photographs and samples.
  • Take statements, remove certain records and documents.
  • Require facilities to assist with enquiries.
  • Do anything else necessary to enable his/her duty to be carried out.

9/3 Enforcement

Where an inspector discovers what is considered to be a contravention of an Act or Regulation, they can:
  • Issue a Prohibition Notice with immediate or deferred effect. Such a notice will prohibit the work described in it. The inspector will issue such a notice where it is considered that there is an imminent risk of serious injury.
An appeal can be made against the notice but the notice will remain in force until the appeal is heard.
  • Issue an Improvement Notice that will specify a timescale within which the rectification of the contravention must take place.
Appeals can be made within 21 days to an industrial tribunal. This would postpone the notice until the appeal is heard.
  • Prosecute any individual who contravenes a requirement or fails to comply with a notice.
  • Seize and/or render harmless any substance or article which is considered to be of imminent danger.
Back to index.

9/4 Penalties

The Health and Safety at Work etc Act, section 33 (as amended) sets out the offences and maximum penalties under health and safety legislation.

Failing to comply with an improvement or prohibition notice, or a court remedy order (issued under the HSW Act sections 21, 22 and 42 respectively):

Lowercourt maximum                    £20,000 and/or 6 months imprisonment

Higher court maximum                    unlimited fine and/or 2 years imprisonment

Breach of sections 2 — 6 of the HSW Act, which set out the general duties of employers, self-employed persons, manufacturers and suppliers to safeguard the health and safety of workers and members of the public who may be affected by work activities:

Lower court maximum                     £20,000
Higher court maximum                    unlimited fine
Other breaches of the HSW Act, and breaches of 'relevant statutory provisions' under the Act, which include all health and safety regulations. These impose both general and more specific requirements, such as requirements to carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment or to provide suitable personal protective equipment:
Lower court maximum                     £5,000
Higher court maximum                    unlimited fine
Contravening licence requirements, or provisions relating to explosives. Licensing requirements apply to nuclear installations, asbestos removal, and storage and manufacture of explosives. All entail serious hazards, which must be rigorously controlled.
Lower court maximum                                 £5,000
Back to index.