Competences for Core Criteria for demonstration
of Competence: Companies, Contractors, Co-ordinators and Designers
The tables
below should help to understand and assess the standards you are required to
meet the standards set out in the core
criteria table below.
·
Column 1 of the table lists the elements which should be
assessed when establishing whether
or not a company is competent for the
work which they will be expected to do.
·
Column 2 lists the standards against which the assessment
should be made.
· Column 3 gives some examples of how a company might demonstrate that it meets these standards.
Companies do not have to produce all of the evidence
listed in column 3 to satisfy the
standard – but they need
to produce enough evidence to show that they meet the standard in column 2, taking account of the nature of the project and the risks which the work
entails. This requires you to make a
judgement as to whether the evidence
provided meets the standard to be
achieved.
If your
judgement is reasonable, and clearly based
on the evidence you have
asked for and been provided with, you
will not be criticised if the company you appoint subsequently proves
not to be competent when carrying out the work.
The assessments should focus on the needs of the
particular job and should be
proportionate to the risks arising from the work. Unnecessary bureaucracy associated with competency assessment obscures the real issues and diverts effort away from them.
If you’re an employer with less than 5 persons
working for you, you do not have to write down your policy, organisation or arrangements under criteria 1 and 2. However, you do need to demonstrate
that your policy and arrangements are adequate in relation to the type of work you do. Assessments of competence will be made easier if your
procedures are clear and accessible.
‘Contractor’,
‘Designer’ and ‘Co-ordinator’ relate to your function, not to the type of organisation.
Criteria
|
Standard to
be achieved
|
Examples of the evidence that you
could use to demonstrate you meet
the required standard
|
|
Stage 1 assessment
|
|||
1
|
Health and
safety policy and organisation for health and safety
|
You are
expected to have and implement an appropriate policy, regularly reviewed, and
signed off by the managing director
or equivalent.
The policy
must be relevant to the nature and scale of your work and set out the
responsibilities for health and safety management at all levels within the organisation.
|
A signed,
current copy of the company policy
(indicating when it was last reviewed and by whose authority it is published).
Guidance on
writing company policies for health and safety can be found in HSE free
leaflet INDG 259.
|
2
|
Arrangements
|
These should
set out the arrangements for health and safety management within the
organisation and should be relevant to the nature and scale of your work.
They should set out how the company will discharge their duties under CDM
(2007). There should be a clear indication of how these arrangements are
communicated to the workforce.
|
A clear
explanation of the arrangements which the company has made for
putting its policy into effect and for discharging its duties under CDM (2007).
Guidance on
making arrangements for the management of health and safety can be found in
HSE free leaflet INDG 259.
|
3
|
Competent
advice – corporate and construction related
|
Your
organisation, and your employees,
must have ready access to competent health and safety advice, preferably from within your own organisation.
The advisor
must be able to provide general health and safety advice, and also (from the
same source or elsewhere) advice relating to construction health and safety
issues.
|
Name and
competency details of the source of
advice, e.g. a safety group, trade federation, or consultant who provides health and safety information and advice.
An example from the last 12 months of advice given and action taken.
|
Criteria
|
Standard to
be achieved
|
Examples of the evidence that you
could use to demonstrate you meet
the required standard
|
|
4
|
Training and
information
|
You should
have in place, and implement, training arrangements to ensure your employees
have the skills and understanding necessary to discharge their duties as
contractors, designers or CDM co-ordinators. You should have in place a
programme for refresher training, e.g. a Continuing Professional Development programme or lifelong learning which
will keep your employees updated on new developments and changes to
legislation or good health and
safety practice. This applies throughout the organisation – from Board or equivalent, to trainees.
|
Headline
training records.
Evidence of a
health and safety training culture including
records, certificates of attendance and adequate health and safety
induction training for site based workforce.
Evidence of an active CPD programme. Sample ‘tool
box talks’.
|
5
|
Individual
qualifications and experience
|
Employees are
expected to have the appropriate qualifications and experience for the
assigned tasks, unless they are under controlled and competent supervision.
|
Details of
qualifications and/or experience of specific corporate post
holders, e.g. Board members, Health
and Safety Adviser etc.
Other key
roles should be named or identified
and details of relevant qualifications and
experience provided.
FOR
CONTRACTORS: details of number/percentage of people engaged in the project that
have passed a construction health and safety assessment, e.g. the Construction Skills’ health and safety test or affiliated schemes, or the CCNSG
equivalent.
For site managers, details of any specific training, such as Construction
Skills’ Site Managers Safety Training Scheme
certificate (SMSTS) or equivalent.
For
professionals, details of qualifications
and/or professional institution membership.
For site
workers, details of any relevant
qualifications or training such as
S/NVQ certificates.
Evidence of a
company-based training programme
suitable for the work to be carried out.
|
Criteria
|
Standard to
be achieved
|
Examples of the evidence that you
could use to demonstrate you meet
the required standard
|
|
7
|
Workforce
involvement
|
You should
have, and implement, an established means of consulting with your workforce
on health and safety matters.
|
Evidence showing how consultation is carried
out. Names of appointed safety
representatives.
For those
employing more than five people, be able to describe how you consult with
your employees to achieve the
consultation required.
|
8
|
Accident
reporting and enforcement action; follow up investigation
|
You should have
records of all RIDDOR reportable events for at least the last three years.
You should also have in place a system for reviewing all incidents, and
recording the action taken as a result.
You should
record any enforcement action taken against your company over the last five
years, and the action which you have taken to remedy matters subject to
enforcement action.
|
Evidence
showing the way in which you record and investigate accidents and incidents.
Records of
the last two accidents/incidents and the actions taken to prevent recurrence.
Records of
any enforcement action taken over
the last five years, and what action was taken to put matters right.
(Information on enforcement taken by HSE over the last five years is available
on the HSE website.)
For larger
companies, simple statistics showing incidence rates of major injuries, over
three-day injuries, reportable cases
of ill-health and dangerous occurrences for the last three years.
Records
should include any incidents that occurred whilst the company traded under a
different name, and any incidents
that occur to direct employees or labour-only subcontractors.
|
Criteria
|
Standard to
be achieved
|
Examples of the evidence that you
could use to demonstrate you meet
the required standard
|
|
9
|
Subcontracting/
consulting procedures (if applicable)
|
You should
have arrangements in place for appointing competent subcontractors/
consultants.
You should be
able to demonstrate how you ensure that subcontractors will also have
arrangements for appointing competent subcontractors or consultants.
You should
have arrangements for monitoring subcontractor performance.
|
Evidence showing how you ensure subcontractors
are competent. Examples of subcontractor assessments
you have carried out.
Evidence
showing how you require similar
standards of competence assessment from subcontractors.
Evidence
showing how you monitor
subcontractor performance.
|
10
|
Hazard elimination and risk control (Designers
only)
|
You should
have, and implement, arrangements for meeting your duties under Regulation 11 of CDM (2007)
|
Evidence
showing how you:
• ensure co-operation and co-ordination of design work within the design
team and with other
designers/contractors
• ensure that hazards are eliminated and any remaining risks controlled
• ensure that any structure which will be used as a workplace will meet
relevant requirements of The Workplace (Health Safety and Welfare)
Regulations 1992.
Examples
showing how risk was reduced through design.
A short summary of how changes to
designs will be managed. (Note: the emphasis here should be on practical measures which
reduce
particular risks arising from the
design, not on lengthy procedural documentation highlighting generic risks.)
|
Criteria
|
Standard to
be achieved
|
Examples of the evidence that you
could use to demonstrate you meet
the required standard
|
|
11
|
Risk assessment leading to a safe method of work (Contractors only)
|
You should
have procedures in place for carrying out risk assessments and for developing
and implementing safe systems of
work/method statements.
|
Evidence
showing how the company will identify significant health and safety risks and how they
will be controlled.
Sample risk
assessments or safe systems of work or method statements.
If you employ
less than five persons and do not have written arrangements, you should be
able to describe how you achieve
the above.
|
The
identification of health issues is
expected to feature prominently in
this system.
|
This will depend
upon the nature of the work, but must reflect the importance of this risk
area.
|
||
12
|
Co-operating
with others and
co-ordinating your work with that of other
contractors (Contractors)
|
You should be
able to illustrate how co-operation and co-ordination of your work is achieved in practice, and how you involve the
workforce in drawing up method statements/safe
systems of work.
|
Evidence
could include sample risk assessments, procedural arrangements, and project
team meeting notes.
Evidence of
how the company co-ordinates its
work with other trades.
|
13
|
Welfare
provision
(Contractors)
|
You should be
able to demonstrate how you will ensure that appropriate welfare facilities
will be in place before people start work on site.
|
Evidence
could include for example health and safety policy commitment; contracts with
welfare facility providers; details of type of welfare facilities provided on previous projects.
|
14
|
CDM
co-ordinator’s duties
(CDM
co-ordinators)
|
You should be
able to demonstrate how you go about encouraging co-operation, co-ordination
and communication between designers.
|
The evidence
should be in the form of actual
examples rather than by generic procedures.
|
Criteria
|
Standard to
be achieved
|
Examples of the evidence that you could
use to demonstrate you meet the
required standard
|
|
Stage 2
assessment
|
|||
1
|
Work
experience
|
You should give details of
relevant experience in the field
of work for which you are applying.
|
A simple
record of recent projects or
contracts should be kept, with the phone numbers and addresses of contacts
who can verify that work was carried out with due regard to health and
safety.
This should
be sufficient to demonstrate your ability to deal with the key health
and safety issues arising from the work you are applying for.
Where there
are significant shortfalls in your
previous experience, or there are risks associated with the
project which you have
not managed before, an explanation of
how these shortcomings will be
overcome.
|
Guidance for
assessing competence of a
co-ordinator for a larger or
more complex project, or one with high or unusual risks.
Organisations do not have to produce all of the evidence
listed in column 3 to satisfy the
standard – they simply need to produce enough evidence to show that they meet the standard in column 2, taking account of the nature of the project and the risks which the work entails. This requires you to make a
judgement as to whether the evidence provided meets the standard to be achieved.
If your judgement is reasonable, and clearly based on the evidence provided, you will not be criticised if the company you appoint subsequently proves not to be competent to carry out the work.
If your judgement is reasonable, and clearly based on the evidence provided, you will not be criticised if the company you appoint subsequently proves not to be competent to carry out the work.
Remember that
assessments should focus on the
needs of the particular job and should
be proportionate to the risks arising from the work.
Unnecessary
bureaucracy associated with competency
assessment obscures the real issues
and diverts effort away from them.
Element
|
Sub-element
|
Examples of attainment
|
Stage 1
|
||
Task knowledge appropriate for the tasks to be
undertaken. May be technical or managerial.
|
The design
process
|
Professionally Qualified to Chartered level (Note
1)
Membership of a relevant construction institution,
for example CIBSE; ICE;
IET; IMechE; IstructE; RIBA;
CIAT.
|
Health and
safety knowledge sufficient to perform the task safely, by identifying hazard and evaluating the risk in order
to protect self and others, and to appreciate general background.
|
Health and safety
in construction
|
Validated CPD
in this field (Note 2), and typical
additional qualification e.g. NEBOSH Construction Certificate
Member of the
Health and Safety Register
administered by the ICE (Note
3)
Member of the
Co-ordinators’ Register administered by the Association for Project
Safety
Fellowship of Association for Project Safety
Membership of Institution of Planning Supervisors.
|
Stage 2
|
||
Experience and ability sufficient to perform the
task, including, where appropriate, an appreciation of constructability, to recognise personal limitations,
task-related faults and errors and to identify appropriate actions.
|
Evidence of
work on similar projects with comparable
hazards, complexity and procurement route.
|
Note 1 Chartered membership of a recognised
construction-related institution.
Note 2 For
current professionals this needs to include at least 3 days of appropriate training within the last 2 years, including a general
‘health and safety’ course with a construction bias and/or a specialist ‘co-ordinator’
course.
Note 3 Open to any member of a construction-related institution.
0 comments:
Post a Comment